<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad's Ramblings &#187; ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradsramblings.com/blog/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradsramblings.com/blog</link>
	<description>User Experience, Interaction Design, Fatherhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should Interaction Design Control Behavior?</title>
		<link>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/05/should-interaction-design-control-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/05/should-interaction-design-control-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interaction Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsramblings.com/blog/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There seems to be two schools of thought in the IxDA community regarding how a design should influence a user behavior. On one side there are designers who simply try to support existing behavior patterns, on the other hand designers attempt to directly influence a users behavior pattern. Some argue that it is unethical to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be two schools of thought in the IxDA community regarding how a design should influence a user behavior. On one side there are designers who simply try to support existing behavior patterns, on the other hand designers attempt to directly influence a users behavior pattern. Some argue that it is unethical to directly try to influence, or change, a users behavior without them knowing it. In my opinion, if you are not causing the user undue harm by modifying their behavior, it is fair game.<span id="more-140"></span></p>
<p>From a global point of view, both schools of thought end up doing the same thing. If a designer is simply supporting existing behavior, they are influencing the user to keep doing the same old thing. A designer who looks to directly effect the behavior of a user can drive innovation for new products, services, and methods. They don’t get caught up in what the user does today, but what they might do tomorrow.</p>
<p>Do you think there is an ethical issue here? If we can’t design new ways of doing things, does this stifle innovation? What camp do you fall in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/05/should-interaction-design-control-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
