<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad's Ramblings &#187; RIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradsramblings.com/blog/tag/ria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradsramblings.com/blog</link>
	<description>User Experience, Interaction Design, Fatherhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Should Agencies Use Flash?</title>
		<link>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/04/how-should-agencies-use-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/04/how-should-agencies-use-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interaction Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradsramblings.com/blog/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TweetA month ago I was asked to write on how heavy usage of Flash effects the User Experience of a website, specifically for Interactive Agencies by Brain Schartz (twitter). In the example that Brain gives in his tweet, it is &#8230; <a href="http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/04/how-should-agencies-use-flash/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="tweetbutton73" class="tw_button" style=""><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbradsramblings.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D73&amp;text=RT%20%40bnunnally%20New%20Blog%20Post%20-%20How%20Should%20Agencies%20Use%20Flash%3F%20%23UX&amp;related=&amp;lang=en&amp;count=horizontal&amp;counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fbradsramblings.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F04%2Fhow-should-agencies-use-flash%2F" class="twitter-share-button"  style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://bradsramblings.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;">Tweet</a></div><p>A month ago I was asked to write on how heavy usage of Flash effects the User Experience of a website, specifically for Interactive Agencies by <a href="http://www.wearespoke.com/">Brain Schart</a>z (<a href="http://twitter.com/creativereason">twitter</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://leoburnett.com/"><img class="aligncenter" title="Tweet Blog Request: How does Flash effect the User Experience for Interactive Agencies" src="http://img.skitch.com/20090414-cg6fifdj2suag9wg5pb7x7c56w.jpg" alt="" width="562" height="85" /></a>In the example that Brain gives in his tweet, it is clear whoever made this site was trying to show off their abilities using the Flash platform. <span id="more-73"></span>The result is a piece of digital &#8216;art&#8217; rather than a designed website that highlights the agencies capabilities and work. This is a classic mistake of sites that go heavy on the Flash.</p>
<p>The use of Flash on the web has been debated for years, and best practices are well documented. Rather than rehash what is already out there I will just highlight a couple things to keep in mind when incorporating Flash into a design.</p>
<ol>
<li>Use as an accessory &#8211; Don&#8217;t let Flash become the be all end all. The use of Flash, or any other RIA platform, should be a small portion of the design of a site. This allows for the content of your site to be more accessible and SEO friendly.</li>
<li>Degrade Gracefully &#8211; Using a full Flash site doesn&#8217;t inherently mean it will convey a bad user experience. Steps can be taken to offer a fully standard compliant XHTML alternative, and a style that support mobile browsers.</li>
<li>Website, not Art &#8211; Don&#8217;t get all &#8216;Flashy&#8217; (pun intended) just to show off your skills. Showing off your business and portfolio should not be buried in a piece of art.</li>
</ol>
<p>Using an RIA platform as part of your site can do wonders to impress your users. The old adage holds true though, content is king. If a site is too rich or too interactive, you can distract or mislead a user. Using these new and exciting interactive platforms  responsibly can offer users a much deeper and richer experience.</p>
<p>Some links to what others have said on this topic:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/10/30/65-excellent-flash-designs/">65 Excellent Flash Designs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uie.com/browse/ria/">UIE RIA Archives</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dmalouf/what-is-rich-why-do-rich-web-application-summit">What is &#8220;rich&#8221;? Why do &#8220;rich&#8221;?</a></li>
</ul>
<p>If you have other links please post them in the comments and I will add to this list.</p>

<div class="like">
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fbradsramblings.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F04%2Fhow-should-agencies-use-flash%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:62px; "></iframe>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bradsramblings.com/blog/2009/04/how-should-agencies-use-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

